Skip to main content

The fact that you are paranoid means everything, especially that they are trying to get you.



Upon reading the AP article below, I was compelled  to write:


It has been demonstrated that some connected to each of you, in one way or another, have the capacity to perform any abomination. The below and my earlier  ​
 Gmail - Failure to protect confidential data of your employees..pdf
​demonstrates why I object to your inclusion of the personal data on one of your employees in files provided to me.

And no, I shall not delete it. 

The fact that you are paranoid does not mean that they are not out to get you. You may remember that your officers were concerned about my possible possession of nuclear weapons.





JILL LAWLESS










Associated Press - ‎Tuesday‎, ‎October‎ ‎14‎, ‎2014





LONDON — A man accused of plotting a terrorist attack in Britain had former Prime Minister Tony Blair's address in his car, a prosecutor said Tuesday during opening arguments in a trial held under contentious conditions of secrecy.
Erol Incedal, a 26-year-old Londoner, is accused of preparing a terrorist act and possessing bomb-making instructions. He denies the charges.
In opening arguments at a London criminal court, lawyer Richard Whittam said the Blair address might be significant, though prosecutors don't argue that Incedal "had settled on a specific target or a particular methodology" for an attack.
He said Incedal may have been planning to attack a "significant" individual or to stage indiscriminate Mumbai-style shootings.
As leader, Blair took the U.K. into the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, a decision that remains widely unpopular in Britain.
Whittam said the piece of paper with Blair's address was found in a glasses case in Incedal's car when he was stopped for a traffic offense in September 2013. He said that during the search, police placed a listening device in the car.
Incedal was arrested later that year, and prosecutors sought to have the trial held in secret on national security grounds.
British judges often impose reporting restrictions while trials are underway, usually to avoid prejudicing future proceedings, and portions of trials have previously been held without media or the public present. But lawyers said an entire secret criminal trial was unprecedented.
After a challenge from media organizations, a judge ruled that some sections should be held in public, including part of the prosecution's opening statement and the verdict.
Some journalists will be allowed to attend proceedings, but not to report on them as they unfold.
A second suspect arrested with Incedal, Mounir Rarmoul-Bouhadjar, has pleaded guilty to possessing a document entitled "bomb making" and will be sentenced at the end of the trial.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Even More Fatally Flawed And Still Unfit for Purpose or The Great Distraction

Subject: RIPA Advisory Board – More Fatally Flawed and Still Unfit for Purpose   I wanted to wait until I came into possession of the actual 2025 Annual RIPA Report, before writing this, but I found myself between a rock and a hard place. My strongest motivator was fear; fear of reading a newspaper or web-account of the RIPA results or seeing a TV Broadcast that is ruled by lies and/or happy talk. I remember last year too well.  I also feared that, as was the case with the reports from the last few years, the RIPA Report, to which the press has early or immediate access, would not become available to me for several days.  Because of that, I decided to write this.   “Racial Discrimination is an inference that may be drawn from Racial Disparities.” In the absence of other inferences, or plausible explanations, our choices become limited.   There is an abundance of racial disparities to be found in RIPA data. I am unaware of any adverse disparity that has...
Post a Comment
Read more

Self-Inflicted Wounds are quite useful

April 6, 2014 Richard Hylton 13166 Jane Court San Diego, CA 92129 HyltonRichard@gmail.com By Email On the day that preceded the presentation of Vehicle Stop Data, by the SDPD, an email was circulated with this leading sentence. Update:   After reviewing the year-long   data   on race released by SDPD, there are major differences between what the   data   showed at 8 months versus at the end of 12 months. We don’t know why the numbers are so different (e.g. the number of stops per month fell significantly between January and December), but this underlines the need for a thorough, independent analysis of the   data   that can be communicated to the public. In light of this development, we have updated the ACLU’s comments below. The above was shocking and surprising, since it came from a writer who knew that a significant –some would say dramatic- fall-off in data collection rates had occurred in the fourth quarter. Evidence of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Deception

Background The United States Department of Justice has an opinion and position that is at odds with that of the San Diego Police Department. It holds that: "The guarantee to all persons of equal protection under the law is one of the most fundamental principles of our democratic society. Law enforcement officers should not endorse or act upon stereotypes, attitudes, or beliefs that a person’s race, ethnicity, or national origin increases that person’s general propensity to act unlawfully. There is no tradeoff between effective law enforcement and protection of the civil rights of all Americans; we can and must have both." In 2011, during litigation, Vehicle Stop data for the prior two years was sought. The City of San Diego, in sworn and other statements or filings, denied having any Vehicle Stop Data and convinced the court of that fact. In January 2013 I learned that the City had committed perjury. Following that I obtained and distributed Vehicle Stop...
Post a Comment
Read more