Skip to main content

Sacramento: A failure to create Early Warning Systems costs lives.

The California Department of Justice has had the power and obligation to take all necessary steps to ensure that the laws of the State are equally applied and that persons are not denied the protections of the California and United States Constitutions, on prohibited bases. That the CA-DOJ has failed in this undertaking; has failed spectacularly is not open to debate; see first its 11 month-tardy implementation of  the base requirements of AB953. The CA_DOJ has had access to Sacramento's Database of Police interactions which Database are the basis for officer evaluation— an early warning system—and failed to act on it. That the local stewards of the business of the City of Sacramento, failed to curtail the exercise of the baser instincts of the "Shootists", of recent renown, is worse. Their inclinations towards Blacks shine plain and have done so for years. There is at least 2 years of data to prove it.

At this writing, I do not have the identification of the individual "Shootists", but I expect to have them within 10 days, unless the standard tactic of evasion is exercised. I do have the records of their interactions with the public, however. I am in a position to comment on display the disparities the exist department-wide. Similar data exists at the officer-level.

Summary of Findings

1.      Sacramento officers stopped, searched, arrested, and issued more citations to Blacks, by proportion, than Whites and Asians. They ordered Blacks out of their cars more often, and detained them longer. Hispanics fare better, but not well. These findings remain constant, and so significant, over a span of two years. As a practical matter, to understand the within, one needs go no farther than the stacked-bar chart on  reproduced here.

Figure 5


2.    When the two years are separated, the trend in adverse consequences for stop and post-stop encounters shows worsening for Blacks and Hispanics. 

3.       Blacks receive a disproportionate share of citations; 1.7 times as many, by population, as Whites.

4.      The extraordinarily low citation rate[1] for Blacks (7% lower than the next closest group, and 14% below Whites) is the result of an extraordinarily disproportionately high number of stops; a disproportion shown in the massive Disparity Index of 2.54 (Stops to Population %; the disparity to Whites, who have a disparity index of .79, is 3.22.)

5.      The stop disproportion for Blacks, by far, outstrips that all other groups.
·         Some 35.28% of SACRAMENTO stops were of Blacks, who make up 13.90% of Sacramento’s population. When compared to the inverse disproportion enjoyed by Whites, Black stop disproportion is massive.
·         Asians are around 18.30% of the population but compose only 7.40%  of stops; an inverse disparity to population, and to Whites. A Massive inverse proportionality to Blacks and Hispanics.
·         Whites are 34.70% of the population but compose just 27.45% of stops; an inverse disparity.
·         Hispanics are 26.40% of the population and compose 22.13% of stops.

6.      The ACLU holds that Consent Searches are discretionary searches and that these are good indicators of bias. Blacks are searched 2.39 times as often as Whites but yield 26% fewer Hits, and 30% fewer than Asians; Sacramento wastes resources with its Black- Focus. See Error! Reference source not found.

7.      There is no forbearance data.

8.      The rate at which Blacks are ordered to exit Vehicles, are monstrous when compared to Whites (2.15) only Hispanics approach them, and that approach is not close. It suggests that bigotry suggest that Blacks are perceived as being inherently more dangerous, a misapprehension that has resulted in deaths.

9.      At 13.38 minutes, the stop duration for Blacks is 13% higher than it is for Whites. Here again they are in the company of Hispanics, a group that “enjoys” an average stop duration of 12.91 minutes.

10.  Many stops continue to appear to be motivated by a “Hit”-driven desire to determine the parole or probationary status of individuals who are often assumed to be predominantly Black or Hispanic. However, there is no data to show how SACRAMENTO is able to say how such persons —those subject to 4th Waiver searches— may be identified. The disparities shown by these data suggest that race is the basis of “identification”; it usually is.

11.  Except for two values “Hit Rates” (Error! Reference source not found.), a value derived from searches, and Citation Rates (Error! Reference source not found.Error! Reference source not found.) there are no instances where stop or post-stop rates for Asians are greater than Whites; a peculiar privilege, Asian Privilege. See also Error! Reference source not found..

12.  All disparities between Blacks and Whites and large; those between Blacks and Asians are massive.





[1] Citation rate is the number of citations div. total stops. Citation issuance rate is citation rate div. population %; here EDP.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Even More Fatally Flawed And Still Unfit for Purpose or The Great Distraction

Subject: RIPA Advisory Board – More Fatally Flawed and Still Unfit for Purpose   I wanted to wait until I came into possession of the actual 2025 Annual RIPA Report, before writing this, but I found myself between a rock and a hard place. My strongest motivator was fear; fear of reading a newspaper or web-account of the RIPA results or seeing a TV Broadcast that is ruled by lies and/or happy talk. I remember last year too well.  I also feared that, as was the case with the reports from the last few years, the RIPA Report, to which the press has early or immediate access, would not become available to me for several days.  Because of that, I decided to write this.   “Racial Discrimination is an inference that may be drawn from Racial Disparities.” In the absence of other inferences, or plausible explanations, our choices become limited.   There is an abundance of racial disparities to be found in RIPA data. I am unaware of any adverse disparity that has...

Self-Inflicted Wounds are quite useful

April 6, 2014 Richard Hylton 13166 Jane Court San Diego, CA 92129 HyltonRichard@gmail.com By Email On the day that preceded the presentation of Vehicle Stop Data, by the SDPD, an email was circulated with this leading sentence. Update:   After reviewing the year-long   data   on race released by SDPD, there are major differences between what the   data   showed at 8 months versus at the end of 12 months. We don’t know why the numbers are so different (e.g. the number of stops per month fell significantly between January and December), but this underlines the need for a thorough, independent analysis of the   data   that can be communicated to the public. In light of this development, we have updated the ACLU’s comments below. The above was shocking and surprising, since it came from a writer who knew that a significant –some would say dramatic- fall-off in data collection rates had occurred in the fourth quarter. Evidence of the ...

Deception

Background The United States Department of Justice has an opinion and position that is at odds with that of the San Diego Police Department. It holds that: "The guarantee to all persons of equal protection under the law is one of the most fundamental principles of our democratic society. Law enforcement officers should not endorse or act upon stereotypes, attitudes, or beliefs that a person’s race, ethnicity, or national origin increases that person’s general propensity to act unlawfully. There is no tradeoff between effective law enforcement and protection of the civil rights of all Americans; we can and must have both." In 2011, during litigation, Vehicle Stop data for the prior two years was sought. The City of San Diego, in sworn and other statements or filings, denied having any Vehicle Stop Data and convinced the court of that fact. In January 2013 I learned that the City had committed perjury. Following that I obtained and distributed Vehicle Stop...