The California Department of Justice has had the power and obligation to take all necessary steps to ensure that the laws of the State are equally applied and that persons are not denied the protections of the California and United States Constitutions, on prohibited bases. That the CA-DOJ has failed in this undertaking; has failed spectacularly is not open to debate; see first its 11 month-tardy implementation of the base requirements of AB953. The CA_DOJ has had access to Sacramento's Database of Police interactions which Database are the basis for officer evaluation— an early warning system—and failed to act on it. That the local stewards of the business of the City of Sacramento, failed to curtail the exercise of the baser instincts of the "Shootists", of recent renown, is worse. Their inclinations towards Blacks shine plain and have done so for years. There is at least 2 years of data to prove it.
At this writing, I do not have the identification of the individual "Shootists", but I expect to have them within 10 days, unless the standard tactic of evasion is exercised. I do have the records of their interactions with the public, however. I am in a position to comment on display the disparities the exist department-wide. Similar data exists at the officer-level.
Summary of Findings
Figure 5
At this writing, I do not have the identification of the individual "Shootists", but I expect to have them within 10 days, unless the standard tactic of evasion is exercised. I do have the records of their interactions with the public, however. I am in a position to comment on display the disparities the exist department-wide. Similar data exists at the officer-level.
Summary of Findings
1.
Sacramento
officers stopped, searched, arrested, and issued more citations to Blacks, by
proportion, than Whites and Asians. They ordered Blacks out of their cars more
often, and detained them longer. Hispanics fare better, but not well. These
findings remain constant, and so significant, over a span of two years. As a
practical matter, to understand the within, one needs go no farther than the
stacked-bar chart on reproduced here.
Figure 5
2. When
the two years are separated, the trend in adverse consequences for stop and
post-stop encounters shows worsening for Blacks and Hispanics.
3.
Blacks receive a disproportionate share of
citations; 1.7 times as many, by population, as Whites.
4.
The
extraordinarily low citation rate[1]
for Blacks (7% lower than the next closest group, and 14% below Whites) is the
result of an extraordinarily disproportionately high number of stops; a
disproportion shown in the massive Disparity Index of 2.54 (Stops to Population
%; the disparity to Whites, who have a disparity index of .79, is 3.22.)
5.
The
stop disproportion for Blacks, by far, outstrips that all other groups.
·
Some
35.28% of SACRAMENTO stops were of Blacks, who make up 13.90% of Sacramento’s population.
When compared to the inverse disproportion enjoyed by Whites, Black stop
disproportion is massive.
·
Asians
are around 18.30% of the population but compose only 7.40% of stops; an inverse disparity to population, and to Whites. A Massive inverse
proportionality to Blacks and Hispanics.
·
Whites
are 34.70% of the population but compose just 27.45% of stops; an inverse disparity.
·
Hispanics
are 26.40% of the population and compose 22.13% of stops.
6.
The ACLU holds that Consent Searches are discretionary
searches and that these are good indicators of bias. Blacks are searched 2.39
times as often as Whites but yield 26% fewer Hits, and 30% fewer than Asians;
Sacramento wastes resources with its Black- Focus. See Error!
Reference source not found.
7.
There is no forbearance data.
8.
The
rate at which Blacks are ordered to exit Vehicles, are monstrous when compared
to Whites (2.15) only Hispanics approach them, and that approach is not close.
It suggests that bigotry suggest that Blacks are perceived as being inherently
more dangerous, a
misapprehension that has resulted in deaths.
9.
At
13.38 minutes, the stop duration for Blacks is 13% higher than it is for
Whites. Here again they are in the company of Hispanics, a group that “enjoys”
an average stop duration of 12.91 minutes.
10. Many stops
continue to appear to be motivated by a “Hit”-driven desire to determine the
parole or probationary status of individuals who are often assumed to be
predominantly Black or Hispanic. However, there is no data to show how SACRAMENTO
is able to say how such persons —those subject to 4th Waiver
searches— may be identified. The disparities shown by these data suggest that
race is the basis of “identification”; it usually is.
11. Except for two
values “Hit Rates” (Error!
Reference source not found.), a value derived
from searches, and Citation Rates (Error!
Reference source not found.Error!
Reference source not found.) there are no
instances where stop or post-stop rates for Asians are greater than Whites; a
peculiar privilege, Asian Privilege.
See also Error!
Reference source not found..
12. All disparities
between Blacks and Whites and large; those between Blacks and Asians are massive.
[1]
Citation rate is the number of citations div. total stops. Citation issuance rate is citation rate div.
population %; here EDP.
Comments
Post a Comment