Skip to main content

Hylton Remembers: While The Mich Cows Remain Productive and The Beatings are Unabated

 Around 1970, when I was but a wee boy, of nineteen, Nikita Khrushchev published a memoir: Khrushchev Remembers.

I liked the sound of the title and emulate it often.


Hylton remembers that POST, the sister Agency of the CA-DOJ, the one that launched the investigation that brought about Montana’s investigation of Hylton, including the interception of his mail, was an award-winner too.  Yes, on recollection, the YouTube video and perhaps RIPA documents and including items on YouTube, claim, rather trumpet, that POST’s video productions, a central part of its now, much reviled curriculum, was an award winner too.  The following is what the California Department of Justice has to say about its ward, or its ward's the award-winning spawn or relative:

 

After the DPA’s award-winning 2020 audit of SFPD’s use of force policy, SFPD implemented about half of DPA’s recommendations by June 2022. The DPA is increasingly closing cases based on evidence, rather than claiming the evidence insufficient.808 The DPA is also progressively resolving cases in a timely manner before the statutes of limitations run. The DPA is not without its critics. Some police reform activists believe DPA is not equipped with sufficient tools to effect change in SFPD, despite being able to make discipline and policy recommendations and being well-funded. Critics point to the SFPD Chief’s refusal to impose any discipline in twenty-five percent of cases for which DPA recommended discipline.811 However, the Chief agreed with the DPA’s recommended discipline in forty-one percent of cases and actually imposed more discipline than DPA recommended in thirteen percent of cases.812 Another concern is the inability of DPA to require the SFPD to make urgent reforms.813 DPA officials also noted that they can issue reform suggestions, but cannot enforce discipline measures until new policies are updated, which allows officer misconduct to continue in the meantime.

 

My experiences with the SF DPA differ. Not only were they slow with the intake of my complaint(s), but they also misstated the contents and nature of it, in violation of law. As you know, or should, the law requires that upon entry or acceptance of a complaint, an acknowledgement, in the complainant's own words, be provided.

 The essence of my complaint was and remains that:

  1. Asians were being milked, for Citation revenue and;
  2. Further reductions in stops, which reductions were based on a hope that such reductions may bring about a diminution of disparities, had already been tried and had not worked but have failed spectacularly.



I do know that, after I complained to the CA-DOJ/RIPA Advisory Board, of SF DPA’s sloth, which complaint was, to a large extent, based on my misapprehension of the legal deadline that governs the issuance of "findings.", a report of findings was issued and sent to me. I did not read it, for SF DPA had not followed the law (misstating my complaint, not using my words); had not promptly handled the intake of the complaint; had not followed its own procedures in providing regular status updates.

I do note that the massive reductions in SFPD stops are duly noted in the 2023 RIPA Report, but without meaningful comment. Let me repeat one that I have made often, San Francisco’s Use-of-force disparities trend upwards, despite the award(s) won. Tell them to talk to POST about awards.

In the aforementioned complaint, I asserted that San Diego should stop fewer people, and that San Francisco could not possibly stop fewer. See the San Francisco's article on "What are exactly are they doing? SF Traffic cops issue just 10 citations"



I can happily claim that both LEAs and/or those who administer their affairs, have been obedient since the time of my writings. San Diego is stopping far fewer people, almost half the number they used to, and The DPA has not embraced, or has put on "hold", the already disproven madness that was at the heart of my complaint; a further ridiculous stop reduction where they had already reduced stops by almost 75%. Moreover, Boudin has already been driven out of Office.

 I would like to say “All’s well that ends well” but we are nowhere near the end of anything. Black people, especially, continued to be beaten up, but if the data numbers are correct, fewer of them. But if these smaller numbers are compared to their Whitecounterparts, it is indisputable that things are getting worse.

 No wonder the reduced stop numbers have no meaningful comments; something curious; something strange, since the plaudits to the SF DPA have everything to do with awards won for things connected to Use-Of-Force; the Black Disparity for which stands at 10. As I recall, last year it was quite a bit lower.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Even More Fatally Flawed And Still Unfit for Purpose or The Great Distraction

Subject: RIPA Advisory Board – More Fatally Flawed and Still Unfit for Purpose   I wanted to wait until I came into possession of the actual 2025 Annual RIPA Report, before writing this, but I found myself between a rock and a hard place. My strongest motivator was fear; fear of reading a newspaper or web-account of the RIPA results or seeing a TV Broadcast that is ruled by lies and/or happy talk. I remember last year too well.  I also feared that, as was the case with the reports from the last few years, the RIPA Report, to which the press has early or immediate access, would not become available to me for several days.  Because of that, I decided to write this.   “Racial Discrimination is an inference that may be drawn from Racial Disparities.” In the absence of other inferences, or plausible explanations, our choices become limited.   There is an abundance of racial disparities to be found in RIPA data. I am unaware of any adverse disparity that has...
Post a Comment
Read more

Self-Inflicted Wounds are quite useful

April 6, 2014 Richard Hylton 13166 Jane Court San Diego, CA 92129 HyltonRichard@gmail.com By Email On the day that preceded the presentation of Vehicle Stop Data, by the SDPD, an email was circulated with this leading sentence. Update:   After reviewing the year-long   data   on race released by SDPD, there are major differences between what the   data   showed at 8 months versus at the end of 12 months. We don’t know why the numbers are so different (e.g. the number of stops per month fell significantly between January and December), but this underlines the need for a thorough, independent analysis of the   data   that can be communicated to the public. In light of this development, we have updated the ACLU’s comments below. The above was shocking and surprising, since it came from a writer who knew that a significant –some would say dramatic- fall-off in data collection rates had occurred in the fourth quarter. Evidence of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Deception

Background The United States Department of Justice has an opinion and position that is at odds with that of the San Diego Police Department. It holds that: "The guarantee to all persons of equal protection under the law is one of the most fundamental principles of our democratic society. Law enforcement officers should not endorse or act upon stereotypes, attitudes, or beliefs that a person’s race, ethnicity, or national origin increases that person’s general propensity to act unlawfully. There is no tradeoff between effective law enforcement and protection of the civil rights of all Americans; we can and must have both." In 2011, during litigation, Vehicle Stop data for the prior two years was sought. The City of San Diego, in sworn and other statements or filings, denied having any Vehicle Stop Data and convinced the court of that fact. In January 2013 I learned that the City had committed perjury. Following that I obtained and distributed Vehicle Stop...
Post a Comment
Read more