Skip to main content

The Land of Milk and Cookies


At home, we discussed and agreed that if Mrs. Hylton was being stopped by a cop, at night, she would proceed to a gas station or some heavily trafficked place; a place with people. We agreed that in doing so she would risk being shot at while trying to get to that place. (I do not recall any such discussion where I was concerned.) Nowadays neither of us go out at night, at least not alone. I rarely do so at daytime either.

So now, if I did not misread your article,  we have cops complaining that they can't shoot every Black that they come upon after traffic stops; for fear of the press and the public. What is the world coming to?


According to accounts –including one coming from the police and from television coverage–this man, this convicted felon, was allegedly driving erratically on a freeway and somehow made his way to a place where people were; a place with pedestrian traffic. Various accounts show that many of those people had camera phones. They are sometimes called witnesses. Some had access to milk and cookies.



Cynicism compels me to conclude that the accounts and outcome would be different if the motorist had not used the Hylton strategy.

The account, from the union leader and that of the victim, is that the cop did not shoot and consequently was sucker-punched, overpowered and pistol-whipped by the “un-shot motorist”, who came into possession of the gendarme's weapon. The motorist elected not to shoot (and so has been charged with attempted-murder? I swear!) 

The disarmed cop claims that he (and his idiot union leader agrees) did not shoot because he was afraid of media attention. In short, shoot or face media scrutiny were his only choices. I daresay that he made the correct choice, but for the wrong reason. At the same time, the Birmingham PD bemoans the lack of assistance from passersby and takes umbrage to comments that were posted on social media. One post mentions that milk and cookies were placed alongside the unconscious policeman along with a naptime comment. I bemoan the waste of milk and cookies.

That the police earned and enjoy community contempt is evident. Read some of the Twitter and Facebook traffic. Malcolm X said something about roosting chickens.

The police union and others continue to use the hackneyed 99:1 good cop/bad cop claim, together with descriptions of the dedication of the majority. This is unnecessary and unacceptable. Unnecessary and unacceptable because it tries to convince us that we must accept the 1%.

I fear for the community when this policeman returns to duty. Perhaps, the retribution has already begun and I daresay it shall not be coming from the 99%.

Birmingham used to be famous for church bombings; Black churches; Black baby girls dead.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Anything For Armstrong

  January 28, 2021   Richard Hylton San Diego, CA 92129   HyltonRichard@gmail.com or RHylton@San.RR.com   William H. Orrick III United States District Court Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102   Re: Allen v. City of Oakland, Case No. C00-4599 WHO                 By Surface Mail   Dear Judge Orrick. I am a resident of California who lives in San Diego. Members of my family have lived in San Francisco, California since the 1930s. Most of my family lives in the Bay Area; scattered from Daly City to Hercules.   My brother has had experiences with the Oakland Police Department. His Rastafarian hair operated as a magnet. He moved to San Francisco. My niece no longer lives in Oakland. Her family lives in Oakland. I visit Oakland less often than I used to. My last visit to Oakland was a drive-through, in S...

Telling the new lie was just a matter of time; or as I call it, a matter of transparency

Richard Hylton  <hyltonrichard@gmail.com> Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:29 PM To: Tarryn Mento <tmento@kpbs.org> Cc: CouncilMember Chris Cate <chrisCate@sandiego.gov>, Office of the General Manager <generalmanager@kpbs.org>, Allen Young <AllenY@sandiego.gov> The piece on your website today that featured incoming chief Nisleit, is more of the same. It is not “fake news” but it is “weak news”, and so it is not news. It fails to accurately represent the essential findings of a watered-down report that was prepared by your station’s license holder, San Diego State University.   I daresay that the fine folk from SDSU, despite their inability to understand the nature of data, found much more than what you have stated. The widespread disparities, requiring corrective action as reported by SDSU, went well beyond searches, alone. Indeed, the most massive disparity was in the use of Field Interviews, an item from Nisliet’s wheelhouse. ...

The fact that you are paranoid means everything, especially that they are trying to get you.

Upon reading the AP article below, I was compelled  to write: It has been demonstrated that some connected to each of you, in one way or another, have the capacity to perform any abomination. The below and my earlier  ​   Gmail - Failure to protect confidential data of your  employees ..pdf ​demonstrates why I object to your inclusion of the personal data on one of your  employees  in files provided to me. And no, I shall not delete it.  The fact that you are paranoid does not mean that they are not out to get you. You may remember that your officers were concerned about my possible possession of  nuclear weapons . JILL LAWLESS Associated Press - ‎Tuesday‎, ‎October‎ ‎14‎, ‎2014 LONDON — A man accused of plotting a terrorist attack in Britain  had former Prime Minister Tony Blair's address in his car , a prosecutor said Tuesday during opening arguments in a trial held...