Skip to main content

POST:The Comedians Who Train Cops

POST is an agency within the California Department of Justice. The acronym, POST, is an abbreviation for the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. It may be all of of that, but it is more than that, for it is a pillar in the perpetuation of prejudice. It is also, by law, the critical vehicle through which changes to police training, adopted or adapted from lessons learned, from data-collection, will be implemented. They have a cute phrase to describe it. They will be "informed by data" or something that sounds like that (even as they preside over or ignore the manufacture of false data.) But even now, and for 12-20 years, POST has been an instructor and purveyor of prejudice; it is a propagandist. It must be brought to heel. How? I have no answer but shall try to find one.


The California Department of Justice; the parent of POST, is a Law Enforcement Agency. Its head, the California Attorney General is the State's top cop. Even so, or despite this fact, a cop has been placed in charge of implementing a law geared to ending Racial Profiling, by cops. A fox is in charge of guarding the henhouse.

When first I observed the Attorney General's presentation to the assembled throngs for the initial RIPA meeting, he began with a lie. He claimed that racial profiling data had not been collected before, conveniently ignoring the large California cities, Los Angeles and Oakland, that have collected data under court supervision for over 10 years. He, the Attorney General forgot the large agencies that had collected data, voluntarily, some for over 20 years. This includes the largest of them all, the CHP. It also includes The City of Sacramento, a municipality that has not bothered to examine its collected data for ten years (I, and the public, know the results of that neglect, but all are reassured that SPD operations are now being monitored or supervised by the CA-DOJ.) 
 'I liked him before not well, but now I like him much worse.'

The Attorney General has presided over the enactment and implementation of a collection of regulations and protocols that,  if they were not designed to emasculate or neuter AB 953, an intelligent deliberate design could have done no better. But I have raced ahead of myself. This is about comedians: this is about POST.

One of the first RIPA-Board meetings was held in San Diego, in July 2017. POST was proudly present but its presentation was putrid. The presentation was begun with a boast that the video that was to follow was award-winning. The videos message is that racial-profiling is a perception; not a reality. The video, is contained in a Youtube item, identified as RIPA Board Meeting, San Diego Part One. Watch  it, if you can, if you dare. Perhaps, the baleful look of the attendee, in the foreground, communicates enough.


Soon after, insulted, un-surprised but not enraged, 1, by a communication  posted on its web-site, asked POST to remove its award-winning tripe from the police-training curriculum. I was promptly ignored. That was almost two years ago. I asked again, but more in earnest, on April 24, 2019 @3:00PM. Now POST is out of time. I have been patient. 

As the table, built from the examination of almost 1 million California records (912,505) shows,  racial-profiling, as defined by California law is real. Blacks are stopped, on average, more than twice population presence, but have, by far, the lowest citation rates —a strong indicator that stops are constitutionally infirm. The other post-stop actions speak for themselves. 

In a non-public meeting of THE STOP DATA AND EVIDENCE-BASED RESEARCH SUBCOMMITTEES, held on February 2, 2019, the minutes of which were partially memorialized as follows:

Deputy Chief Kathy Lester from SPD commented that the agency has a 20-year history of stop data collection and analysis. Lamberth Associates conducted study assessing driving demographics and vehicle stops approximately 10 years ago. The study found that the frequency with which the agency stopped the black civilians was about twice as high as the driving population and Hispanics was close twice as much as well.
Doubtless Sacramento's analyses were defective, and lacking in depth and diligence or was ignored, for the marauders in police ranks were easily identifiable; all 207 of them.  Perhaps, the analyses, about which Deputy Chief Lester spoke, are non-existent; mere figments of her imagination. In any event, they served no purpose; they did no good.

I regret that the CA-DOJ did not have Deputy Chief Lester stand in the stead of the man from POST, when the RIPA board met in San Diego. But comments such as Lester's are never made by LEA-types, in public fora. Prejudice needs privacy to fester and to nurture and to prepare for the blossoming, blooming and production of its bile; only the manifestation is public.


I hope that you, like me, perceive that numbers never lie, but Post does and has won awards for it; more or less like the Attorney General, who, so far, has won nothing, but I wish him well in his anti-Trump sallies.


Sometime within the next 30 days POST will be invited to "Show Cause" why the data and its product, the within table, are wrong; i.e. why they should not be ordered to recall their award-winning video, and discontinue training and other means of disseminating the foul and false propaganda that the award-winning video preaches.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Collecting, Categorizing and Analyzing Demographic Data in San Diego in the years of the Profiling Plague.

A letter essentially identical to the below was sent to Chief Lansdowne on the date indicated. I refrained from using my preferred expression "bullshit detector" and instead used the lame "balderdash detector." I must and will do better. February 15, 2014 William Lansdowne Chief, San Diego Police Department By email to : sdpdpolicechief @pd.sandiego.gov Subsequent to my communication, to you, that contained my analysis of 2013 stop data , I located one or more Official San Diego documents that contained other analyses and officer comments. The analyses were not at odds with mine. So were the observations and comments, including those of the officers and supervisors. I harbour no doubt that you are familiar with all of them. Aside from directing you to the obvious, i.e. the possibility of constituting stop analysis data from Citation data [1] , I will let you re-read them for yourself. Vehicle Stop Form Racial Categories The United States ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Berkeley; the bastion of progressive values?

April 26, 2018 Yesterday, I sent the within to the Mayor of Berkeley and others, in the mayor's office, as listed. Much nothing will come of it; not until Berkeley is sued for some  atrocity in policing. Believe me, it is just a matter of time. Doubtless we will have the usual protestations, denials and promises. The lot below shall not be able to say that they did not know of the rot; the oppression; the bias. Berkeley's data is, for want of a polite expression, piss-poor. This opinion may be partly driven by the fact that the data is not in the form that Berkeley represents it to be; that over 3,400 records have no demographic data, and that it leaves out some of the most basic, the most common, policing data elements. On the other hand, it carries data of other persons involved in the stop, but one cannot determine who is driver and who is passenger. It is, as it is, but it tells the same old story, and it tells plenty; albeit less vividly than most other places. Mayor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Even More Fatally Flawed And Still Unfit for Purpose or The Great Distraction

Subject: RIPA Advisory Board – More Fatally Flawed and Still Unfit for Purpose   I wanted to wait until I came into possession of the actual 2025 Annual RIPA Report, before writing this, but I found myself between a rock and a hard place. My strongest motivator was fear; fear of reading a newspaper or web-account of the RIPA results or seeing a TV Broadcast that is ruled by lies and/or happy talk. I remember last year too well.  I also feared that, as was the case with the reports from the last few years, the RIPA Report, to which the press has early or immediate access, would not become available to me for several days.  Because of that, I decided to write this.   “Racial Discrimination is an inference that may be drawn from Racial Disparities.” In the absence of other inferences, or plausible explanations, our choices become limited.   There is an abundance of racial disparities to be found in RIPA data. I am unaware of any adverse disparity that has...
Post a Comment
Read more